Topic, argumentation and dogmatically organized Law
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.4013/rechtd.2018.102.04Abstract
The article aims to clarify the origins of the theory of argumentation and to demonstrate that one cannot speak of a “correct” and a “mistaken” sense of the expression, since the concept varies greatly throughout its history. In this direction, it discusses its original relationship with the concept of topic, whose Aristotelian sense is by no means unique, and, in addition to having an older history, extends to contemporary juridical argumentation. It concludes with examples of some of the most significant arguments for the area of law.
Keywords: argumentation, topic and jurisprudence, syllogism.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
I grant the journal RECHTD the first publication of my article, licensed under Creative Commons Attribution license (which allows sharing of work, recognition of authorship and initial publication in this journal).
I confirm that my article is not being submitted to another publication and has not been published in its entirely on another journal. I take full responsibility for its originality and I will also claim responsibility for charges from claims by third parties concerning the authorship of the article.
I also agree that the manuscript will be submitted according to the journal’s publication rules described above.