The teaching of Philosophy of Law and the Case-Method: Some considerations on its challenges in Latin America
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.4013/rechtd.2018.102.02Abstract
The case-method became the main methodology for achieving significant learning outcomes in Law. The pedagogical and didactical advantages of this method for legal disciplines, such as criminal law, civil law, and contracts are well known. Nevertheless, the educational contributions of the case method for jurisprudence, legal theory or the philosophy of law are less examined. In this article, I will maintain that case method can actually make a significant contribution to teach and learn philosophy of law in the Latin-American educational context. I will argue the former by highlighting some preconditions for a meaningful learning and teaching experience on philosophical problems through case-method. Later, I will present three challenges of case-method education applied to the philosophy of law; that is, (a) recruitment of highly qualified teachers; (b) training on this teaching methodology, considering the peculiarities of legal philosophy; (c) considerations for implementing the case-method in large courses.
Keywords: case-method, legal training, legal philosophy, active learning methodology.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
I grant the journal RECHTD the first publication of my article, licensed under Creative Commons Attribution license (which allows sharing of work, recognition of authorship and initial publication in this journal).
I confirm that my article is not being submitted to another publication and has not been published in its entirely on another journal. I take full responsibility for its originality and I will also claim responsibility for charges from claims by third parties concerning the authorship of the article.
I also agree that the manuscript will be submitted according to the journal’s publication rules described above.