Therapeutic treatment and the false logic of consensus
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.4013/rechtd.2017.92.07Abstract
The legal nature of the consent for medical treatment is analyzed in a comparative perspective between the Italian and Brazilian experiences from the evidence of their analogies and differences. The debate developed on the topic has raised the attention that, in both cases, the respective legal systems are directed to the autonomy of the patient. But in Italy, unlikely to what occurs in Brazil, normative definitions offer significant openings to the freedom of choice of the patient, who may also choose not to be treated. In contrast, the Brazilian system brings respect to life as a basilar principle, imposing on the physician to intervene, thus limiting the patient’s proclaimed autonomy.
Keywords: Medical-surgical activity, patient autonomy, dignity, consent by medical act.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
I grant the journal RECHTD the first publication of my article, licensed under Creative Commons Attribution license (which allows sharing of work, recognition of authorship and initial publication in this journal).
I confirm that my article is not being submitted to another publication and has not been published in its entirely on another journal. I take full responsibility for its originality and I will also claim responsibility for charges from claims by third parties concerning the authorship of the article.
I also agree that the manuscript will be submitted according to the journal’s publication rules described above.