The state responsibility in administrative contracts for culpa in contrahendo and culpa post factum finitum
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.4013/rechtd.2015.73.13Abstract
The objective of this study is to analyze the state liability for culpa in contrahendo and post factum finitum given the nature and complexity of the rules governing the different stages of administrative contracts. It examines whether the assumptions governing business relationships based mainly on objective good faith and trust may be extended to administrative contracts, in order to protect the contracting party that guides its conduct by such premises, protecting the right of compensation for damages and future earnings, especially when the exhaustion of the contract occurs because of a conduct attributed to the state. Regarding the methodology applied, the article adopted the inductive method for establishing the conceptual assumptions and practices applied to the issue of state liability for culpa in contrahendo and post factum finitum, so as to establish to what extent the interpretation of the legal provisions favors the application of this responsibility and the consequent determination of its effects and extension.
Keywords: state responsibility, administrative contract, culpa in contrahendo, post factum finitum, objective good faith.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
I grant the journal RECHTD the first publication of my article, licensed under Creative Commons Attribution license (which allows sharing of work, recognition of authorship and initial publication in this journal).
I confirm that my article is not being submitted to another publication and has not been published in its entirely on another journal. I take full responsibility for its originality and I will also claim responsibility for charges from claims by third parties concerning the authorship of the article.
I also agree that the manuscript will be submitted according to the journal’s publication rules described above.