Constitutional precommitment and collective autonomy: Can they be reconciled?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.4013/rechtd.2015.73.03Abstract
One of the central goals in contemporary constitutional theory is the search for a democratic process that protects individual rights and guarantees from risk, while also defending its own integrity. There is an inherent tension between the concepts of constitution (understood as a mechanism that safeguards individual rights and liberties) and democracy (taken as collective autonomy). Some scholars have tried to reconcile these ideals using the notion of constitutional precommitment that defines a constitution as a self-imposed constraint put into effect by and for the people in order to ensure the fundamental values and conditions of democracy. This paper analyzes the precommitment model in constitutional theory especially according to the current U.S. debate. In the final analysis, adding new elements to this discussion, this work defends that the relationship between precommitment and collective autonomy may be better understood with the redefi nition of the concepts of constitution and democracy.
Keywords: constitutional precommitment, collective autonomy, democracy, people.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
I grant the journal RECHTD the first publication of my article, licensed under Creative Commons Attribution license (which allows sharing of work, recognition of authorship and initial publication in this journal).
I confirm that my article is not being submitted to another publication and has not been published in its entirely on another journal. I take full responsibility for its originality and I will also claim responsibility for charges from claims by third parties concerning the authorship of the article.
I also agree that the manuscript will be submitted according to the journal’s publication rules described above.