The constitutional referendum and the saga of institutions reforms in Italy: Much ado about nothing
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.4013/rechtd.2017.92.01Abstract
The article reconstructs the process that had lead to the constitutional referendum held in Italy in 2016, attempting to evaluate the outcome and its political-institutional implications. It is divided in four parts: in the first part, it shows that the reform has failed in the lap of the history of Italian constitutional reforms; in the second, it summarizes the contents of the constitutional project submitted to referendum; in the third part, it analyzes the political, social, geographic, ideological and generational fractures expressed by the vote. The fourth part argues that the only institution to come out stronger in the recent referendum is the Constitutional Court, presuming a transformation in the sense of a juristocracy in the weak and fragmented Italian political system.
Keywords: Italy, constitutional referendum, form of government, institutional reforms, constitutional reforms, Electoral Law, constitutional jurisprudence.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
I grant the journal RECHTD the first publication of my article, licensed under Creative Commons Attribution license (which allows sharing of work, recognition of authorship and initial publication in this journal).
I confirm that my article is not being submitted to another publication and has not been published in its entirely on another journal. I take full responsibility for its originality and I will also claim responsibility for charges from claims by third parties concerning the authorship of the article.
I also agree that the manuscript will be submitted according to the journal’s publication rules described above.