From the concept to the rule of law: the Kramer–Postema debate
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.4013/rechtd.2024.161.09Abstract
In this essay, my main goal is to present an important debate in contemporary jurisprudence: the debate between Matthew Kramer and Gerald Postema about the conditions for law itself to exist as a distinctive system of Governance and the demands of legality. Since the debate resonates some of the theses that were first presented by Lon Fuller in The Morality of Law, I also seek to present them in general terms and then defend what seems to me to be their best, most adequate interpretation. This way, drawing precisely upon Fuller’s work — contextualised and correctly understood —, I seek to articulate a defence of Postema’s arguments about the existence and rule of law.References
DUFF, R.A. 1986. Trials and Punishments. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 332 p.
FULLER, L.L. 1969. The Morality of Law. 2ª ed. New Haven, Yale University Press, 1969, 262 p.
_____. 1958. Positivism and Fidelity to Law: A Reply to Professor Hart. Harvard Law Review, 71(4):630-672.
GARDNER, J. 2012. Law as a Leap of Faith. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 260 p.
HART, H.L.A. 1994. The Concept of Law. 2ª ed. Oxford, Clarendon Press, 315 p.
_____. 1958. Positivism and the Separation of Law and Morals. Harvard Law Review, 71(4):593-629.
_____. 2001. Essays in Jurisprudence and Philosophy. 2ª ed. Oxford, Clarendon Press, 396 p.
KRAMER, M.H. 1999. In Defense of Legal Positivism: Law Without Trimmings. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 313 p.
_____. 2007. Objectivity and the Rule of Law. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 247 p.
_____. 2018. H.L.A. Hart: The Nature of Law. Cambridge, Polity, 260 p.
_____. 2022. Gerald Postema and the Rule of Law. In: MCBRIDE, M. KURKI, V. J. (eds.) Without Trimmings: The Legal, Moral, and Political Philosophy of Matthew Kramer. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 624 p.
LOPES, J.R.L. 2021. Curso de Filosofia do Direito: o Direito como Prática, 2ª ed. São Paulo, Atlas, 440 p.
PERRY, S.R. 1998. Hart’s Methodological Positivism. Legal Theory, 4(4):427-467.
POSTEMA, G.J. 1999. Implicit Law. In: WITTEVEN, W.J; VAN DER BURG, W. (eds.) Rediscovering Fuller: Essays on Implicit Law and Institutional Design. Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Press, 500 p.
_____. 2014. Fidelity in Law’s Commonwealth. In: AUSTIN, L.M.; KLIMCHUCK, D. (eds.) Private Law and the Rule of Law. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 368 p.
_____. 2022. From Law’s Existence to Law’s Rule: Reflections on Kramer’s Understanding of the Rule of Law. In: MCBRIDE, M. KURKI, V. J. (eds.) Without Trimmings: The Legal, Moral, and Political Philosophy of Matthew Kramer. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 624 p.
RAZ, J. 2002. Practical Reason and Norms, 3ª ed. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 224 p.
_____. 2011. The Authority of Law, 2ª ed. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 356 p.
RUNDLE, K. 2012. Forms Liberate: Reclaiming the Jurisprudence of Lon L Fuller. Oxford, Hart Publishing, 209 p.
WILLIAMS, B. 2008. In the Beginning was the Deed: Realism and Moralism in Political Argument. Princeton, Princeton University Press, 200 p.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
I grant the journal RECHTD the first publication of my article, licensed under Creative Commons Attribution license (which allows sharing of work, recognition of authorship and initial publication in this journal).
I confirm that my article is not being submitted to another publication and has not been published in its entirely on another journal. I take full responsibility for its originality and I will also claim responsibility for charges from claims by third parties concerning the authorship of the article.
I also agree that the manuscript will be submitted according to the journal’s publication rules described above.