Hermeneutic Criticism of Law: From the theoretical framework to the articulation of a philosophical position in the reflection on Law
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.4013/rechtd.2017.93.09Abstract
This article presents the philosophical bases of the Hermeneutic Criticism of Law, formulated by Lenio Streck. In order to do so, it uses the concepts of theoretical referential framework and of philosophical paradigm. It then offers a bibliographical review of the thinkers who, to a certain extent, founded the philosophical paradigm in which the Hermeneutic Criticism of Law is developed: Martin Heidegger and Hans-Georg Gadamer. Finally, it identifies some of the last developments of the Hermeneutic Criticism of Law, understood not as a traditional epistemology, or even a philosophy of the sciences, but as a hermeneutic epistemology.
Keywords: theory of law, philosophy of law, philosophical paradigm, rationality, Lenio Streck.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
I grant the journal RECHTD the first publication of my article, licensed under Creative Commons Attribution license (which allows sharing of work, recognition of authorship and initial publication in this journal).
I confirm that my article is not being submitted to another publication and has not been published in its entirely on another journal. I take full responsibility for its originality and I will also claim responsibility for charges from claims by third parties concerning the authorship of the article.
I also agree that the manuscript will be submitted according to the journal’s publication rules described above.