Logical normativity in Hegel and Brandom

Authors

  • Agemir Bavaresco Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul.
  • Christian Iber Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4013/fsu.2019.201.02

Abstract

The research is articulated in three moments. Initially, the position of Brandom is presented, explaining the pragmatic-semantic normativity, that is, the pragmatic-semantic theory of Brandom’s linguistic reason. What is the difference between the inferential semantics of the Brandomian theory of language and the relational semantics of the Hegelian theory of thinking? After that, normativity is debated in Hegel’s logic, that is, his theory of the alienation of the thought of itself in the circularity and the contradiction in the logic of the essence, having as background the norm of truth exposed in the logic of the concept. Finally, to the idealistic realism of the concept, in which Brandom and Hegel coincide, is opposed philosophical realism as its permanent challenge.

Keywords: pragmatics, semantics, normativity, idealism, realism.


Downloads

Author Biographies

Agemir Bavaresco, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul.

 

Christian Iber, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul.

 

Downloads

Published

2019-05-03

How to Cite

BAVARESCO, A.; IBER, C. Logical normativity in Hegel and Brandom. Filosofia Unisinos / Unisinos Journal of Philosophy, São Leopoldo, v. 20, n. 1, p. 13–20, 2019. DOI: 10.4013/fsu.2019.201.02. Disponível em: https://www.revistas.unisinos.br/index.php/filosofia/article/view/fsu.2019.201.02. Acesso em: 18 jun. 2025.

Issue

Vol. 20 No. 1 (2019): Jan-Apr

Section

Articles

License

I grant the Filosofia Unisinos – Unisinos Journal of Philosophy the first publication of my article, licensed under Creative Commons Attribution license 4.0 (which allows sharing of work, recognition of authorship and initial publication in this journal).

I confirm that my article is not being submitted to another publication and has not been published in its entirely on another journal. I take full responsibility for its originality and I will also claim responsibility for charges from claims by third parties concerning the authorship of the article.