THE CONFORMATION OF THE MODERNIST SQUARE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.4013/arq.2020.162.09Abstract
Brazilian landscaping has striking characteristics, mainly due to the pioneering work of architect Roberto Burle Marx. Modernist architects were usually hired to design open spaces and this article questioned how the modernist square was designed by them. Based on a double case study set in the Brazilian hinterland, and considering contemporary architectural panorama and the process of circulation of ideas, the paper analyses Napoleão Moreira da Silva square (1957-1962), designed by José Augusto Bellucci, and Santos Dumont square (1970), designed by Ícaro de Castro Mello, in two distinct periods of the country’s architectural history. Built upon original documents and historical photographic records, the formal analysis considers the conformation and composition of flower beds, sidewalks, vegetation and furniture. As a result, the paper indicates that architects adapted architectural design strategies and formal repertoire to the design of squares, and thus landscaping and architecture consolidate common forms and related ideas through the sharing of technical knowledge and aesthetic affinities.
Keywords: architectural design, Brazilian architecture, circulation of ideas, design methodology, modernist architecture.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
I grant the journal Arquiteturarevista the first publication of my article, licensed under Creative Commons Attribution license (which allows sharing of work, recognition of authorship and initial publication in this journal).
I also take full responsibility for the copyright of images, photos and data included in the submitted work. I confirm that my article is not being submitted to another publication and has not been published in its entirely on another journal. I take full responsibility for its originality and I will also claim responsibility for charges from claims by third parties concerning the authorship of the article, its data and images.
I am responsible for approval in the specific ethics boards for each purpose, whenever necessary.