Legal being and its attributes in Presocratic philosophy

Autores

  • Roman Grynyuk Vasyl’ Stus Donetsk National University
  • Yurii Hotsuliak Vasyl' Stus Donetsk National University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4013/rechtd.2019.113.04

Resumo

The article researches how are the main features of legal being   disclosed in the ancient Presocratic teachings. In particular, it is being analyzed the cosmic liability of Anaximander. Pythagoras' ideas about regulation are considered as a separate category, not as a personified image. According to Heraclitus's teachings, it is being researched the place of the Fire and Logos categories in the legal being. The author clarifies the importance of Parmenides's ontological doctrine for the formation of ancient ideas about legal being, as well as the regulatory value of love and hate in the notions of Empedocles. The article analyzes the nature concept as a criterion of truth and quality for the material rules pursuant to the Democritus philosophical doctrine.

Biografia do Autor

Roman Grynyuk, Vasyl’ Stus Donetsk National University

Professor at the Department of Constitutional Law of Vasyl’ Stus Donetsk National University. Doctor of Juridical Science. Rector of Vasyl’ Stus Donetsk National University, st. 600-richchia, 21, Vinnytsia, 21021, Ukraine.

Yurii Hotsuliak, Vasyl' Stus Donetsk National University

Associate Professor at the Department of Theory and History of State and Law of Vasyl’ Stus Donetsk National University. Doctor of Juridical Science. Rector of Vasyl’ Stus Donetsk National University, st. 600-richchia, 21, Vinnytsia, 21021, Ukraine.

Referências

ARISTOTLE. 1999. Nicomachean Ethics. Translated by W.D. Ross. Kitchener, Batoche Books, 182 p. <https://socialsciences.mcmaster.ca/econ/ugcm/3ll3/aristotle/Ethics.pdf>. Accessed on: 08 Aug. 2019.

CURD, P.; GRAHAM, D. 2008. The Oxford Handbook of Presocratic Philosophy. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 588 p.

DIOGENES LAËRTIUS. 1925. Lives of the eminent philosophers. Loeb Classical Library. Book VIII. Cambridge, Harvard University Press. <http://penelope.uchicago.edu/Thayer/E/Roman/Texts/Diogenes_Laertius/Lives_of_the_Eminent_Philosophers/8/Pythagoras*.html>. Accessed on: 08 Aug. 2019.

EBERHARD, J. 2001. Justification: The heart of the Christian Faith. London, Bloomsbury. 302 p.

GUTHRIE, W.K.C. 1962. A history of Greek Philosophy. The earlier Presocratics and Pythagoreans. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press,. 488 p.

HEIDEGGER, M. 1991. Country Path Conversation. Moskow, Progress Publisher. <http://www.odinblago.ru/haideger_razgovor>. Accessed on: 08 Aug. 2019.

LEONARD, W. E. 1906. The Fragments of Empedocles. New York, Cornell University Library, 218 p.

NILL, M. 1985. Morality and self-interest in Protagoras, Antiphon and Democritus. Leiden, printed by E.J. Brill. 124 p.

SCHIAPPA, E. 1991. Protagoras and Logos. Columbia, University of South Carolina Press, 226 p.

STAMATELLOS, G. 2012. Introduction to Presocratics: a Thematic Approach to Early Greek Philosophy with Key Reading. West Sussex, John Wiley & Sons, 151 p.

VAMVAKAS, C. J. 2009. The Founders of Western Thought: The Presocratics. Dordrecht, Springer, 291 p.

Downloads

Publicado

2020-02-11

Edição

v. 11 n. 3 (2019): Setembro/Dezembro

Seção

Artigos

Licença

Concedo a Revista de Estudos Constitucionais, Hermenêutica e Teoria do Direito (RECHTD) o direito de primeira publicação da versão revisada do meu artigo, licenciado sob a Licença Creative Commons Attribution (que permite o compartilhamento do trabalho com reconhecimento da autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista).

Afirmo ainda que meu artigo não está sendo submetido a outra publicação e não foi publicado na íntegra em outro periódico e assumo total responsabilidade por sua originalidade, podendo incidir sobre mim eventuais encargos decorrentes de reivindicação, por parte de terceiros, em relação à autoria do mesmo.

Também aceito submeter o trabalho às normas de publicação da Revista de Estudos Constitucionais, Hermenêutica e Teoria do Direito (RECHTD) acima explicitadas.