Between objectivity and surveillance: the jornalistic contradictions
Abstract
This article aims to confront two representations related to journalistic identity. For one of them, journalists are considered distant observers of the facts. For the other, journalists are took as “watchdogs”. According to the first point of view, objectivity is the most important value to follow. Regarding the second representation, surveillance and denunciation are duties related to the journalistic mission. However, this two positions seems to be contradictory: how to be objective and “watchdogs” at the same time? Can someone be a distant observer while assuming values judgments? This questions leads an interpretation of the most different (and maybe contradictories) elements involved in journalistic identity.Issue
Section
Articles
License
I grant the journal Verso e Reverso the first publication of my article, licensed under Creative Commons Attribution license (which allows sharing of work, recognition of authorship and initial publication in this journal).
I confirm that my article is not being submitted to another publication and has not been published in its entirely on another journal. I take full responsibility for its originality and I will also claim responsibility for charges from claims by third parties concerning the authorship of the article.
I also agree that the manuscript will be submitted according to the journal’s publication rules described above.