Relations among communication, aesthetics and politics according to Habermas’s and Rancière’s conceptualizations
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.4013/fem.2013.153.01Abstract
The distinctions between the conceptualizations of Jacques Rancière and Jürgen Habermas concerning the notions of “agreement”and “disagreement” in communicative interactions are the guidelines of this article. Its aim is to provide a better understanding of the articulations among communication, aesthetics and politics considering the way Habermas and Rancière present the situation of interlocution in three specific dimensions: (a) the configuration of the political interlocution (comprehending scene, actors and matters of subject); (b) the understanding concerning how the notion of “equality” must assure political exchange; and (c) the conception of politics that comprises poetics and experience.
Key words: aesthetics, politics, dissensus, communication.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
I grant the journal Fronteiras - estudos midiáticos the first publication of my article, licensed under Creative Commons Attribution license (which allows sharing of work, recognition of authorship and initial publication in this journal).
I confirm that my article is not being submitted to another publication and has not been published in its entirely on another journal. I take full responsibility for its originality and I will also claim responsibility for charges from claims by third parties concerning the authorship of the article.
I also agree that the manuscript will be submitted according to the journal’s publication rules described above.
