Advertising and trompe l’oeil: Seduction and production of meanings
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.4013/fem.2013.152.06Abstract
This paper discusses the relationship between advertising and the trompe l’oeil technique. In order to identify the ways in which advertising uses this technique and to evaluate the potential of meanings added to advertising as well as to the products or brands, when associated with this technique, we make use of Baudrillard (1997, 2004) to deal with advertising and the trompe l’oeil. The question will also be posed after a semiotic analysis of an ad of shoes of the brand Christian Louboutin from the perspective of the semiotics or logic of Charles Sanders Peirce, which makes it possible to inventory the potential of meanings engendered by the ad through its qualitative, referential and symbolic aspects. This paper may be relevant to show how the look constructed with the technique of trompe l’oeil sets up an atmosphere of seduction, which is intensified with the referential and symbolic aspects of advertising as shown by the analysis.
Key words: Advertising, trompe l’oeil, seduction, production of meanings.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
I grant the journal Fronteiras - estudos midiáticos the first publication of my article, licensed under Creative Commons Attribution license (which allows sharing of work, recognition of authorship and initial publication in this journal).
I confirm that my article is not being submitted to another publication and has not been published in its entirely on another journal. I take full responsibility for its originality and I will also claim responsibility for charges from claims by third parties concerning the authorship of the article.
I also agree that the manuscript will be submitted according to the journal’s publication rules described above.