Natural law and “dominium”: An analysis on the basis of human rights in Domingo de Soto

Authors

  • Marcus Paulo R. Boeira UFRGS/Direito

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4013/fsu.2017.183.15

Abstract

The article aims to examine the understanding of Domingo de Soto on the natural law and its projection for the analysis of human rights. Starting from Thomas Aquinas, the Segovian author situates the institute of the “dominium” in the spectrum of demands of the natural law, subjecting it to the table of the first principles of practical reason. In the article proposed here we seek to explore the analytical discourse present in two of his works: De Iustitia et Iure and Relectio de Dominio.

Keywords: law, dominium, right, reason.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Marcus Paulo R. Boeira, UFRGS/Direito

Marcus Paulo Rycembel Boeira. Professor de Filosofia do Direito e Lógica Jurídica na Faculdade de Direito da UFRGS (Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul). Doutor em Ciências e Mestre em Direito pela USP. Líder do Grupo de Pesquisa CNPq Lógica Deôntica, Linguagem e Direito.

Downloads

Published

2017-12-13

How to Cite

BOEIRA, M. P. R. Natural law and “dominium”: An analysis on the basis of human rights in Domingo de Soto. Filosofia Unisinos / Unisinos Journal of Philosophy, São Leopoldo, v. 18, n. 3, p. 234–246, 2017. DOI: 10.4013/fsu.2017.183.15. Disponível em: https://www.revistas.unisinos.br/index.php/filosofia/article/view/fsu.2017.183.15. Acesso em: 23 may. 2025.

Issue

Vol. 18 No. 3 (2017): September/December

Section

Dossier

License

I grant the Filosofia Unisinos – Unisinos Journal of Philosophy the first publication of my article, licensed under Creative Commons Attribution license 4.0 (which allows sharing of work, recognition of authorship and initial publication in this journal).

I confirm that my article is not being submitted to another publication and has not been published in its entirely on another journal. I take full responsibility for its originality and I will also claim responsibility for charges from claims by third parties concerning the authorship of the article.