The impenetrable animal heart: Descartes and Condillac on animals
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.4013/fsu.2013.143.05Abstract
During French modernity, comparison between animals and humans is a key to understand what “human” is, as shown by Descartes’s and Condillac’s works. An analysis of these works allows us to see how, during modernity, two questions about animals arise. (i) How might one establish a foundation for a resemblance between humans and animals or, on the contrary, consider it illegitimate? (ii) How could one speak philosophically about animals if part of their essence seems to consist of being impenetrable for human knowledge? Reflecting on the position of Descartes and Condillac on animals makes it possible to clarify some of the challenges that contemporary zoophilosophy must solve.
Key words: Descartes, Condillac, animals, animal sensibility, sovereignty, zoophilosophy.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
I grant the Filosofia Unisinos – Unisinos Journal of Philosophy the first publication of my article, licensed under Creative Commons Attribution license 4.0 (which allows sharing of work, recognition of authorship and initial publication in this journal).
I confirm that my article is not being submitted to another publication and has not been published in its entirely on another journal. I take full responsibility for its originality and I will also claim responsibility for charges from claims by third parties concerning the authorship of the article.