Democracia de cooperação social
uma proposta de regime socioeconômico à luz da teoria da justiça de John Rawls
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.4013/fsu.2026.272.09Keywords:
anti-capitalism; social cooperation democracy; workplace democracy; John Rawls; justice as fairness; relational justiceAbstract
The article develops the proposal of a socioeconomic regime called social cooperation democracy, conceived as an alternative compatible with John Rawls’s principles of justice as fairness. The argument builds on Rawls’s critique of capitalist regimes and on the claim that the dispersion of productive wealth and the democratization of workplace relations are indispensable conditions of justice. I argue that social cooperation democracy combines these two elements in an institutional arrangement that expands the basic structure, incorporates the role of corporations, and prevents forms of coercion and domination. The proposal is articulated through a relational interpretation of Rawlsian justice, which emphasizes social cooperation and reciprocity as normative foundations, and through an anti-capitalist perspective that highlights the structural limits of capitalism in realizing democratic equality. The article concludes that social cooperation democracy constitutes an institutional arrangement more responsive to the requirements of liberty, equality, and reciprocity in a well-ordered society.
Downloads
Metrics
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Ulysses Ferraz

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
I grant the Filosofia Unisinos – Unisinos Journal of Philosophy the first publication of my article, licensed under Creative Commons Attribution license 4.0 (which allows sharing of work, recognition of authorship and initial publication in this journal).
I confirm that my article is not being submitted to another publication and has not been published in its entirely on another journal. I take full responsibility for its originality and I will also claim responsibility for charges from claims by third parties concerning the authorship of the article.








