Cities and World Fairs: From “A Stone in a Pond” to “A Meteorite from Another World”
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.4013/arq.2018.142.09Abstract
This paper discusses the understanding revealed by the media about five World Fairs held in the United States: Centennial Exposition, Philadelphia, 1876; World’s Columbian, Chicago, 1893; Pan American Exposition, Buffalo, 1901; Louisiana Purchase Exposition, St. Louis, 1904; and Panama-Pacific International Expo, San Francisco, 1915. The main source of data for the case study is the Chronicling America Project, with two thousand newspapers online. The objective of this article is to compare reactions to these events in their contemporary societies and identify possible distinctions and convergences when compared to ours. Its conclusions reveal an intriguing and ubiquitous apology for these events and the dormancy of controversies they may have generated: The hypothesis that current criticism would be similar in content, form and volume to the analyzed period (1876-1915) was thus not confirmed. The theoretical reference permeates the text and prioritizes distinctions between the perception of the five selected fairs at the time they were held and those more commonly found nowadays concerning large urban events.
Keywords: great exhibitions, city marketing, epistemology of urban studies.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
I grant the journal Arquiteturarevista the first publication of my article, licensed under Creative Commons Attribution license (which allows sharing of work, recognition of authorship and initial publication in this journal).
I also take full responsibility for the copyright of images, photos and data included in the submitted work. I confirm that my article is not being submitted to another publication and has not been published in its entirely on another journal. I take full responsibility for its originality and I will also claim responsibility for charges from claims by third parties concerning the authorship of the article, its data and images.
I am responsible for approval in the specific ethics boards for each purpose, whenever necessary.