Institutional pressures on disclosure of carbon control issues by oil and gas companies
Abstract
This paper evaluates the influence of institutional pressure on climate change project disclosure in oil and gas companies. It was based on a sample of sustainability reports issued by 35 companies included on the 2011 Fortune ranking from the USA, Europe, Latin America and Asia. Empirical results suggest that companies positioned at the top of the Fortune ranking have higher levels of information disclosure on climate change projects. These companies are the most susceptible to normative pressure, contradicting the claim that climate strategy is predominantly associated with the mimetic or coercive pillar. Companies in emerging economies have low levels of disclosure because environmental issues receive less attention than social issues, such as poverty. The study demonstrated that multinationals were subject to low coercive pressures due to the lack of clear regulations and international enforcement mechanisms. The oil and natural gas companies surveyed are exposed to institutional pressure associated with the three types of isomorphism and see disclosure of climate change projects as a way of acquiring legitimacy.
Keywords: climate change, institutional theory, environmental disclosure, oil and gas companies.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
I grant the journal BASE the first publication of my article, licensed under Creative Commons Attribution license (which allows sharing of work, recognition of authorship and initial publication in this journal).
I confirm that my article is not being submitted to another publication and has not been published in its entirely on another journal. I take full responsibility for its originality and I will also claim responsibility for charges from claims by third parties concerning the authorship of the article.
I also agree that the manuscript will be submitted according to the journal’s publication rules described above.